- ATI RADEON XPRESS 200 CHIPSET DRIVER DRIVERS
- ATI RADEON XPRESS 200 CHIPSET DRIVER DRIVER
- ATI RADEON XPRESS 200 CHIPSET DRIVER SOFTWARE
The majority of these offerings are software based, and NVIDIA has spent a lot of time working on this aspect of their technology, and nothing can take that work away from them.ĪTI’s offering does include RAID 0 and 1 and 4 SATA device support.
It doesn’t have RAID 0+1 or SATA 3.0Gb/s support. It doesn’t have overclocking software or a RAID utility to offer a lot of usebility to the user. It doesn’t have any integrated Gigabit Ethernet, or complementing Firewall software with hardware integration. Users looking for a simple, reliable and inexpensive all in one setup for a second machine, or a family’s machine, will find that area occupied now by the ATI XPRESS 200 chipset motherboards.īy looking at the spec sheet on our reference board, you’d have to admit that the ATI XPRESS 200 chipset seems to be behind when it comes to features when comparing it to the recently released NVIDIA nForce4 chipset. The ATI XPRESS 200 chipset does fit a void that has been left empty for AMD users since the release of the nForce2 IGP chipset. It is unlikely, because of those three reasons, that we will see integrated graphics on a core logic release anytime soon that is within reach of the current gaming levels of performance. This is because of the increased cost in adding a more complex GPU, the time of design-to-market that it takes to integrate a GPU onto a north bridge and the fact that ATI and NVIDIA don’t want to gut the sales of their higher-end GPUs (that can be priced higher) with a chipset (that has to have a low price to compete). This has always been the problem with integrated graphics on enthusiast-based motherboards: the IGP is always significantly slower than the mainstream parts of the time. So if that is all that you intend to do with the system you may be building with this chipset, then by all means, use the integrated graphics as you see fit. Older games, such as those we featured with the IGP benchmarks, can work pretty well with the XPRESS 200. It simply isn’t going to cut it with the lastest games and those coming out in the future. My reasoning for this is that if you are a gamer planning on playing new games (like Doom 3, Half Life 2 or Far Cry) you really shouldn’t consider having the integrated graphics being your only GPU. We did some testing on the Quake III, UT2003 and older 3DMark benchmarks, but that was it. You’ll notice that we didn’t do a lot of testing on the performance of the integrated graphics performance on the new ATI XPRESS 200 chipset. We’ll wait to get our hands on some retail boards from ATI to judge for sure, giving ATI some time to come up with something for us.
ATI RADEON XPRESS 200 CHIPSET DRIVER DRIVER
If ATI is taking this chipset venture seriously, then I’d expect to see driver releases that can address this issue of storage speed. That is why we are seeing the slightly lower results in the PCMark, Sysmark, Webmark and Winstone scores. ATI’s XPRESS 200 chipset is still new and thus the same amount of tweaking hasn’t yet been done. VIA has done so as well over the past 2 years for their 8237 south bridge.
ATI RADEON XPRESS 200 CHIPSET DRIVER DRIVERS
NVIDIA has spent a lot of time and released (privately at least) quite a few incremental enhancements on their IDE and SATA controllers and drivers for them. From my understanding, with the new PCIe specifications, there is even less that can be configured or tweaked by the host logic than could be done with the AGP specifications, and thus storage is on front stage.
The main performance factors that remain for chipset designers are graphics buses and storage buses PCI Express and IDE/SATA in this case. The memory controller is one of the most complex parts of the north bridge logic in other chipsts, and now that it has been moved inside the processor on the Athlon 64s, chipset designers have a lot less to worry about.
Fortunately for ATI, with the K8 platform, a healthy part of the performance questions are no longer an issue. When ATI tried to enter the Intel S478 market a year or so ago, their offering there didn’t take off as they had liked, mainly because the performance and feature set were below par when compared to the rest of the market. Professional: CineBench 2003 and KribiBenchĪnytime a new chipset comes to the market, especially one from a vendor that is new to the area, there are always going to be questions, doubts and speculations about the performance.Application: DivX and MP3 Encoding, WinRAR and PCMark.Application: Winstone Tests and Webmark 2004.Synthetic: SiSoft Sandra, AIDA32 and Cachemem.ATI throws its hat into the AMD chipset ring with a chipset that supports PCI Express and a version with integrated graphics for the Athlon 64!.
0 kommentar(er)
